Under it, abortion clinics will have to offer women the option of viewing a sonogram of the living fetus or listening to its heart beat. (Story here)
Of course, the abortion industry lobbied against the law, the story said, "arguing it was an attempt to erode abortion rights by placing new restrictions on clinics."
Restrictions? Offering more information for more fully informed consent to help women "choose" is an intrusion on abortion rights? Only in the Alice in Wonderland world of Planned Parenthood would such a requirement be viewed as an infringement on "choice."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DeSantis replies to Trump
"Check the scoreboard." Follow this link: https://fb.watch/gPF0Y6cq5P/
-
By Dennis Byrne Chicago Tribune The fifth anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, is two weeks away, but the screeching from the conspiracy monkey ho...
-
By Dennis Byrne University of Chicago law professor Geoffrey R. Stone objected to President George W. Bush's veto of funding for embryon...
-
By Dennis Byrne Chicago Tribune If Al Gore had been president ... President Al Gore today asked the United Nations Security Council to pass ...
No comments:
Post a Comment