By Dennis Byrne
With Democrats prematurely "dancing in the end zone" in the conviction that the mid-term elections will endorse whatever it is that their party wants to do about the Iraq War, the time indeed has come for a "different approach."
It's time to take out anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr.
And whatever equally murderous fanatics are on the Sunni side.
But, wait. Wouldn't that propel Iraq into the "civil war" that Democrats have been saying that Iraq has been engaged in since the first day of the U.S. invasion? Wouldn't that upset the delicate balance among the three ethnic/sectarian groups that the U.S. and democratic-minded Iraqis are trying to sustain?
Continue reading at RealClearPolitics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DeSantis replies to Trump
"Check the scoreboard." Follow this link: https://fb.watch/gPF0Y6cq5P/
-
By Dennis Byrne Chicago Tribune The fifth anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, is two weeks away, but the screeching from the conspiracy monkey ho...
-
By Dennis Byrne March 27, 2006 For many Roman Catholics, the latest round of disclosures about pedophile priests in the Chicago archdiocese ...
-
By Dennis Byrne Chicago Tribune Don't search for entertainer Rosie O'Donnell on the faculty of Wheaton College, a distinctively Chri...
1 comment:
Mr. Byrne:
First of all, killing a leader does not end a cause. Martin Luther King's assassination did not stop the civil rights movement. Secondly, Sadr has already lost control over some elements of his army. So the chaos would continue, even if we could bump him off.
Iraq is alredy involved in a civil war. Once we leave it will merely continue to its conclusion, the establishment of three autonomous regions.
Post a Comment