By Dennis Byrne
With Democrats prematurely "dancing in the end zone" in the conviction that the mid-term elections will endorse whatever it is that their party wants to do about the Iraq War, the time indeed has come for a "different approach."
It's time to take out anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr.
And whatever equally murderous fanatics are on the Sunni side.
But, wait. Wouldn't that propel Iraq into the "civil war" that Democrats have been saying that Iraq has been engaged in since the first day of the U.S. invasion? Wouldn't that upset the delicate balance among the three ethnic/sectarian groups that the U.S. and democratic-minded Iraqis are trying to sustain?
Continue reading at RealClearPolitics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DeSantis replies to Trump
"Check the scoreboard." Follow this link: https://fb.watch/gPF0Y6cq5P/
-
It will take tough love and market realism to spur alternatives to America's dependency on petroleum By Dennis Byrne Chicago Tribune I...
-
By Dennis Byrne April 3, 2006 Is The New York Times going bi-polar, or what? The nation's imperial paper recently said it wouldn't e...
-
By Dennis Byrne Chicago Tribune Aristocracy --Government by a small group of people, especially hereditary nobility. Or maybe feudalism is a...
1 comment:
Mr. Byrne:
First of all, killing a leader does not end a cause. Martin Luther King's assassination did not stop the civil rights movement. Secondly, Sadr has already lost control over some elements of his army. So the chaos would continue, even if we could bump him off.
Iraq is alredy involved in a civil war. Once we leave it will merely continue to its conclusion, the establishment of three autonomous regions.
Post a Comment