Under it, abortion clinics will have to offer women the option of viewing a sonogram of the living fetus or listening to its heart beat. (Story here)
Of course, the abortion industry lobbied against the law, the story said, "arguing it was an attempt to erode abortion rights by placing new restrictions on clinics."
Restrictions? Offering more information for more fully informed consent to help women "choose" is an intrusion on abortion rights? Only in the Alice in Wonderland world of Planned Parenthood would such a requirement be viewed as an infringement on "choice."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
DeSantis replies to Trump
"Check the scoreboard." Follow this link: https://fb.watch/gPF0Y6cq5P/
-
By Dennis Byrne If you're a suburban voter and someone knocks on your door asking you how you plan to vote in the congressional election...
-
By Dennis Byrne University of Chicago law professor Geoffrey R. Stone objected to President George W. Bush's veto of funding for embryon...
-
By Dennis Byrne Chicago Tribune Not wanting to become known as the town quack, I am reluctant to write another politically incorrect column ...